UNLESS
How is it possible
for the senate to hear all of the witnesses and all of the evidence
in order to
vote to convict or acquittal
without hearing all of the evidence and all of the
witnesses?
Show me any
'prosecutor' in any country, exception, a communist or socialist country
(one party system
country), that would take their case to court without first making sure those
'prosecutors have ‘
(All of the
information to that case)’?
A committee of
representatives, called “managers,” acts as prosecutors before the
Senate.
Let it start from
2015 Russia), until today?
So, with that said;
"Why should
Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Party take their case to that ‘Crooked Senate
Court’
before they get all of the court cases against the ‘impeached president’
with them in that ‘Crooked Court"?
trump is another
impeached president, so what is the hurry?
Nancy Pelosi and the
Democratic Party now need to take those (state court cases), and there are
many,
to the media every day until those judges in those court cases can get
both parties moving to a conclusion.
Then take that
information to the media and
that ‘Crooked Court’ (Senate Hearing)?
After all that
is what 'trump' and 'the trump republican party' have been doing since
that
'2016 Fake Election'!
In impeachment
proceedings, the House of Representatives charges an official of the federal
government by approving, by majority vote, articles of impeachment.
A committee
of representatives, called “managers,” acts as prosecutors before the Senate.
The Senate sits as a
High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses,
and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official.
In the case of
presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States
presides.
The Constitution
requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an
impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. In some cases, the
Senate has also disqualified such officials from holding public offices in the
future.
There is no
appeal.
Since 1789, about
half of Senate impeachment trials have resulted in conviction and removal from
office.
How is it possible
for the senate to hear all of the witnesses and all of the evidence in order to
vote to convict or an acquittal without hearing all of the evidence and all of the
witnesses?
No comments:
Post a Comment